Hedging losses and foreign currency borrowing adjustments: business loss treatment upheld for forex derivatives, but notional capital loss denied.

Foreign exchange derivative losses incurred as bona fide hedging transactions incidental to export business were treated as business losses, not speculative losses, and set-off against business income was allowed. Deduction under section 80-IA was upheld because the issue was covered in favour of the assessee and no distinguishing feature was accepted. By contrast, notional foreign currency fluctuation loss on a loan taken to acquire capital assets was held to be governed by section 43A; only the actual adjustment on repayment or payment of the foreign currency liability could be capitalised, so the separate deduction claim was disallowed.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the loss arising from forex derivative contracts entered into to hedge foreign currency exposure was a speculative loss or a business loss; (ii) whether deduction under section 80-IA was allowable; (iii) whether the notional foreign currency fluctuation loss on a loan taken for acquiring capital assets was deductible as revenue loss or had to be capitalised under section 43A.

Issue (i): whether the loss arising from forex derivative contracts entered into to hedge foreign currency exposure was a speculative loss or a business loss.

Analysis: The assessee was an exporter with substantial foreign currency receivables and had entered into option contracts through banks only to hedge currency risk. The loss was found to have crystallised on settlement and to be directly connected with the ordinary business operations. The Court held that foreign currency is not to be treated as stock or shares, and that such hedging transactions, when undertaken in the course of export business through regulated banking channels, do not assume the character of speculative transactions.

Conclusion: The forex derivative loss was held to be a business loss and not a speculative loss, and set-off against business income was allowed in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): whether deduction under section 80-IA was allowable.

Analysis: The issue was treated as covered by the jurisdictional High Court in favour of the assessee. No contrary distinguishing feature was accepted, and the lower appellate view granting the deduction was affirmed.

Conclusion: Deduction under section 80-IA was upheld in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iii): whether the notional foreign currency fluctuation loss on a loan taken for acquiring capital assets was deductible as revenue loss or had to be capitalised under section 43A.

Analysis: The Court held that section 43A governs foreign currency fluctuation on acquisition of capital assets from abroad and permits adjustment only of the actual loss or gain arising on repayment or payment of the foreign currency liability. Since the actual loss on repayment had already been capitalised and depreciation allowed, the claimed notional loss could not be separately deducted.

Conclusion: The claim for deduction of the notional capital loss was rejected and the disallowance was sustained against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The common order granted relief on the forex derivative loss issue and on deduction under section 80-IA, while sustaining the disallowance of the notional foreign currency fluctuation loss on capital borrowing, resulting in partial success for the assessees and dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: Foreign exchange derivative losses incurred as bona fide hedging transactions incidental to export business are not speculative losses, whereas foreign currency fluctuation on capital asset loans is governed by section 43A and only the actual adjustment to cost is deductible.

---