Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (7) TMI 801 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Reassessment Orders Quashed Due to Jurisdiction Issue, Commission Payments Upheld, Penal Interest Invalidated The reassessment orders for the assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2008-09 were quashed due to defective jurisdiction based on a change of ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Reassessment Orders Quashed Due to Jurisdiction Issue, Commission Payments Upheld, Penal Interest Invalidated

                            The reassessment orders for the assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2008-09 were quashed due to defective jurisdiction based on a change of opinion in issuing notices under section 148. The disallowance of commission payments to directors under section 36(1)(ii) was not upheld as the payments were for services rendered. The levy of penal interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D became moot with the invalidation of reassessment orders. The directions to verify and allow remuneration to directors were given by the CIT(A). The appeals of the assessee were allowed, dismissing the appeals of the AO.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Defective jurisdiction - Issue of Notice u/s. 148 on a change of opinion - Re-assessment Order may be quashed.
                            2. Disallowance u/s. 36(1)(ii) on account of alleged non-allowable commission payment to the Directors.
                            3. Levy of Penal Interest u/s. 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D.
                            4. Directions by CIT(A) to verify and allow remuneration to directors.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Defective jurisdiction - Issue of Notice u/s. 148 on a change of opinion - Re-assessment Order may be quashed:

                            The primary contention was that the notice issued under section 148 was based on a change of opinion. The assessee argued that during the original scrutiny assessment, all materials were furnished, and the Assessing Officer (AO) had duly applied his mind, considering the same claim while making disallowance u/s. 14A. Therefore, the jurisdiction acquired through the issue of notice u/s. 148 becomes defective and untenable for being tainted with a change of opinion. The appellate authority (FAA) did not adequately address these objections, leading to the conclusion that the order passed by the AO and upheld by the FAA was not valid, as the twin conditions of reopening the matter after a period of four years were missing. The reassessment was thus quashed for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07.

                            For the assessment year 2007-08, although the reopening was within four years, it was still found to be based on a change of opinion, which is not permissible. The AO had already considered the commission payment while making disallowance u/s. 14A during the original assessment. Hence, the reassessment order was invalidated.

                            2. Disallowance u/s. 36(1)(ii) on account of alleged non-allowable commission payment to the Directors:

                            The AO disallowed the commission payments to the directors under section 36(1)(ii), arguing that the payments were in lieu of dividends and thus not allowable as deductions. The FAA supported this view, stating that the payments were not linked to any extra services rendered by the directors and were a device to avoid tax. However, the tribunal found that the payments had been consistently allowed in previous years and were made for services rendered by the directors. The tribunal referred to judgments like Ohm Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. and Voltas Ltd., which held that reassessment based on a mere change of opinion is not valid. Thus, the disallowance was not upheld.

                            3. Levy of Penal Interest u/s. 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D:

                            The appellant denied liability to penal interest on merits. However, as the reassessment orders were invalidated, this issue became moot and was not adjudicated separately.

                            4. Directions by CIT(A) to verify and allow remuneration to directors:

                            The FAA had directed the AO to verify whether the remuneration paid to the directors was within the limits prescribed by the Companies Act and allowable as per the company's resolution. The tribunal, having invalidated the reassessment proceedings, decided the grounds of appeal against the AO for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07.

                            Conclusion:

                            The appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the reassessment orders for the assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2008-09 were quashed due to the invalidity of the reopening based on a change of opinion. Consequently, the appeals of the AO were dismissed.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found