Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's contribution of joint stock as capital to a firm amounted to a transfer within the meaning of section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 so as to attract capital gains.
Analysis: The issue was concluded by following the binding reasoning of the Division Bench decision in the connected matter, which had already held that such contribution did not constitute a transfer for the purposes of section 2(47). On that basis, no computable profits and gains arose under the head "Capital gains".
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative and against the assessee. The contribution of joint stock as capital to the firm did not amount to a transfer under section 2(47), and the Revenue succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Contribution of an asset as capital to a partnership firm does not, by itself, amount to a transfer within section 2(47) so as to give rise to capital gains.