Payment for credit card charges not subject to TDS under Sec.194-H

The Tribunal upheld the decision that payments on account of credit card charges were akin to bank charges, not falling under the purview of commission subject to tax deduction at source. The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, affirming the order treating the Assessee as not liable for TDS on the amount retained by HDFC Bank. The cross-objections by the Assessee were also rejected. The judgment clarified the distinction between bank charges and commission under Sec.194-H of the Income Tax Act, providing a detailed analysis based on relevant precedents and statutory provisions.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether the Assessee was liable to deduct tax at source on the amount retained by HDFC Bank.
2. Whether the payments on account of credit card charges should be treated as commission under Sec.194H of the Income Tax Act.

Analysis:
1. The appeals by the revenue and cross-objection by the Assessee arose from an order treating the Assessee as an Assessee in default for not deducting tax at source. The Assessee, a dealer in purchase and sale of cars, had a credit card/debit card accepting facility with HDFC Bank. The Revenue contended that the amount retained by HDFC Bank was commission paid by the Assessee, thus requiring tax deduction at source under Sec.194-H of the Act. The Assessee argued that HDFC Bank was not acting on its behalf but rendering services to customers using credit/debit cards.

2. The key issue was whether payments on account of credit card charges should be considered as commission under Sec.194H of the Act. The CIT(A), following a decision of the ITAT Hyderabad Bench, held that the payment in question was akin to bank charges, not attracting the provisions of Sec.194-H. The Tribunal upheld this view, citing various cases where similar conclusions were reached. It emphasized that the nature of payments to banks for credit card facilities was more aligned with bank charges rather than commission. The Tribunal also noted a CBDT notification specifying that credit/debit card commission need not be subject to TDS, further supporting the position that such charges were not to be treated as commission under Sec.194-H.

In conclusion, the Tribunal confirmed the order of the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeals of the Revenue. The cross-objections of the Assessee were also dismissed as not maintainable. The judgment clarified the distinction between bank charges and commission, providing a comprehensive analysis of the applicable provisions under the Income Tax Act and relevant precedents to resolve the issues at hand.

---