Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the additional bonus liability settled after the close of the previous year was deductible in computing business income for the relevant assessment year. (ii) Whether deduction under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was to be computed before setting off the unabsorbed development rebate carried forward from the earlier assessment year.
Issue (i): Whether the additional bonus liability settled after the close of the previous year was deductible in computing business income for the relevant assessment year.
Analysis: The liability arose under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 and related to the accounting year in question. A statutory obligation to pay bonus accrued during that year, and later quantification did not postpone the liability to the year of settlement. The existence or absence of an entry in the books was not decisive where the liability had already accrued under law.
Conclusion: The additional bonus amount was deductible and the answer was in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether deduction under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was to be computed before setting off the unabsorbed development rebate carried forward from the earlier assessment year.
Analysis: The computation of the special deduction had to follow the principle that carried forward unabsorbed development rebate was to be deducted first. The controlling rule was the one recognised in the later Supreme Court authority approving the Cambay Electric Supply line of reasoning and disapproving the contrary view based on Cloth Traders. The earlier contrary High Court view could not be followed.
Conclusion: The deduction under section 80-I had to be calculated after setting off the unabsorbed development rebate, and the answer was in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered partly for the assessee and partly for the Revenue, with no order as to costs.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory bonus liability accrues in the accounting year to which it relates and remains deductible even if quantified later, while special deduction under section 80-I must be computed only after first giving effect to carried forward unabsorbed development rebate.