TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether head office expenses attributable to the Indian branches were restricted by section 44C or were allowable in full under Article 7(3) of the India-UAE DTAA; (ii) Whether loss on revaluation of unmatured forward foreign exchange contracts was allowable as a business deduction; (iii) Whether interest on tax-free bonds was exempt in full; (iv) Whether commission income from mobilisation of deposits under the Indian Millennium Deposit Scheme was taxable in India and related expenditure was allowable.
Issue (i): Whether head office expenses attributable to the Indian branches were restricted by section 44C or were allowable in full under Article 7(3) of the India-UAE DTAA.
Analysis: The applicable treaty provision for the relevant years permitted deduction of expenses incurred for the purposes of the permanent establishment. The later protocol amendment introducing a limitation by reference to domestic law operated only prospectively from 1 April 2008. For the years in appeal, the treaty position prevailed and the domestic restriction under section 44C could not be invoked to curtail the deduction.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether loss on revaluation of unmatured forward foreign exchange contracts was allowable as a business deduction.
Analysis: The contracts were entered into in the ordinary course of banking business and were valued consistently on the basis of prevailing exchange rates in accordance with accepted banking practice. Anticipated loss on unmatured contracts was treated as a real business loss on conservative accounting principles, and the liability was not regarded as merely contingent for income-computation purposes.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iii): Whether interest on tax-free bonds was exempt in full.
Analysis: The interest received on tax-free securities was held to qualify for exemption, and the restriction applied by the revenue authorities was not sustained on the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iv): Whether commission income from mobilisation of deposits under the Indian Millennium Deposit Scheme was taxable in India and related expenditure was allowable.
Analysis: The receipt was examined under the business profits article of the India-UAE DTAA. Since the commission was connected with the assessee's business operations and the associated expenditure was incurred for earning that income, the net business profit had to be computed after allowing the expenditure. The revenue's objection to allowance of the expenditure was rejected.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the substantive disputed issues relating to head office expenses, foreign exchange revaluation loss, tax-free bond interest, and treaty-based computation of commission income, resulting in a partial allowance of the assessee's appeals and dismissal of the revenue's appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: For the relevant treaty years, deductions attributable to a permanent establishment must be governed by the treaty's business-profits article rather than domestic restrictions, and anticipated loss on unmatured forward contracts may be allowed where it represents a prudent and consistently applied business valuation.
TaxTMI 
