Cenvat credit stay dispute on peanut butter led to partial pre-deposit amid classification and exemption uncertainty

In a stay application over Cenvat credit demand, the Tribunal treated the classification and exemption dispute on peanut butter as unsuitable for final resolution at the interlocutory stage because tariff heading, HSN notes, end use and product characteristics all remained contested. It also noted substantial revenue neutrality and that part of the credit had already been reversed. On those facts, Rule 3(5B) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was not treated as fully justifying the entire confirmed demand at the stay stage, and a partial pre-deposit was directed with recovery of the balance stayed pending appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether, in a stay application concerning Cenvat credit demand, the appellant was required to make a partial pre-deposit having regard to the competing classifications and exemption dispute relating to peanut butter and whether credit reversal under Rule 3(5B) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was fully attracted on the facts noticed.

Analysis: The order records that the exemption and classification controversy involved consideration of tariff heading, HSN explanatory notes, end use and product characteristics, and that the matter was not fit for final determination at the interlocutory stage. It also notes a substantial element of revenue neutrality and that part of the credit already stood reversed, while the remaining disputed amount was not considered to justify the entire confirmed demand at the stage of stay. On that basis, the Tribunal fixed a partial deposit as a condition for waiver of the balance during pendency of the appeal.

Outcome: Partial pre-deposit was directed, and on compliance the balance recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.

---