Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the direction requiring deposit of Rs. 5 crores as a pre-condition for hearing the appeal was justified.
Analysis: The assessee's unit claimed exemption under Notification No. 3/2005 in relation to alcohol products, while the revenue disputed applicability of the notification and the availability of Cenvat credit. The Court found, at least prima facie, that the revenue's stand was inconsistent with the notification and the tariff regime that came into force from 01.03.2005. In view of that prima facie assessment, the heavy pre-deposit ordered by the Tribunal could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The direction to deposit Rs. 5 crores was set aside and the appeal was directed to be heard on merits.