Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (4) TMI 372 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Payments from Amitech not dividends under 2(22)(e) as commercial transactions, but Rs. 10 lakhs for share allotment upheld. The Third Member held that payments received by the assessee from Amitech Industries Limited were not deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) as they were ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Payments from Amitech not dividends under 2(22)(e) as commercial transactions, but Rs. 10 lakhs for share allotment upheld.

                            The Third Member held that payments received by the assessee from Amitech Industries Limited were not deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) as they were part of commercial transactions, not loans. However, the addition of Rs. 10 lakhs for share allotment was upheld under Section 2(22)(e) as the shares were allotted based on the assessee's application. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the CIT(A)'s order accordingly.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Whether the payments received by the assessee from M/s Amit Poly Yarn Ltd. (now known as M/s Amitech Ind. Ltd.) are receipts as advances against sales made during commercial transactions, thereby not attracting the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or are they purely advances/loans attracting the provisions of Section 2(22)(e)Rs.
                            2. Whether the issue of allotment of shares for Rs. 10 lakhs should be restored to the Assessing Officer to investigate whether the allotment was a unilateral act of the company or done at the instance of the assessee to determine the applicability of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Payments Received by the Assessee

                            The primary contention was whether the payments received by the assessee from M/s Amitech Industries Limited (AIL) were advances against sales made during commercial transactions or loans/advances attracting Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                            - Assessee's Argument: The payments were received during the regular course of business for the sale of yarn. The assessee engaged in similar transactions in preceding and subsequent years, and these were not treated as deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e). The transactions were part of the normal business operations and not loans or advances.
                            - Revenue's Argument: The assessee held more than 30% shares in AIL, which had sufficient accumulated profits. The payments were made against an existing debit balance, thus fulfilling the conditions for Section 2(22)(e) applicability.

                            Judgment:
                            The Third Member agreed with the assessee, holding that the payments were received during the course of trading transactions and not as loans or advances. The business transactions involved regular trading of yarn, with payments and receipts almost equal to the value of yarn supplied. The transactions were part of a running trading account and not in the nature of loans or advances. Hence, Section 2(22)(e) was not applicable.

                            Issue 2: Allotment of Shares

                            The dispute was whether the allotment of shares worth Rs. 10 lakhs was a unilateral act by AIL or done at the instance of the assessee, impacting the applicability of Section 2(22)(e).

                            - Assessee's Argument: The shares were allotted unilaterally by AIL without the assessee's application, and the assessee paid for the shares only after becoming aware of the allotment.
                            - Revenue's Argument: The assessee had applied for the shares, and the allotment was not unilateral. The payment was made subsequently as a repayment of the obligation, thus attracting Section 2(22)(e).

                            Judgment:
                            The Third Member found that the assessee had indeed applied for the shares, as evidenced by the written submission to the Assessing Officer. The allotment was not unilateral, and the subsequent payment was towards the share application money. The addition of Rs. 10 lakhs was correctly made under Section 2(22)(e), as the shares were allotted based on the assessee's application.

                            Conclusion:
                            - The payments of Rs. 64,43,019/- received by the assessee from AIL were not treated as deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) as they were part of commercial transactions.
                            - The addition of Rs. 10 lakhs for the allotment of shares was upheld, confirming the applicability of Section 2(22)(e) for this transaction.

                            Final Order:
                            The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, modifying the order of the CIT(A) accordingly. The payments received were not deemed dividends, but the addition for the share allotment was sustained.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found