Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the import of shell buttons made of a species listed in Schedule IV of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 was liable to confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, and whether the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 required reduction.
Analysis: The goods were found to be made of sea shell of the species identified in the wildlife report, and the species was treated as prohibited for import under the EXIM Policy. On that basis, the prohibition was held to apply and the confiscation of the goods was found justified. At the same time, the value of the goods and the overall facts and circumstances were taken into account for determining whether the monetary penalty was excessive.
Conclusion: Confiscation of the goods was upheld, but the penalty was reduced from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 50,000, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.