Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest on loans advanced by a non-banking financial company could be taxed on accrual basis despite non-receipt, where the assessee claimed application of RBI prudential norms relating to non-performing assets.
Analysis: The loans were advanced on promissory notes and no material was produced to show that interest had become overdue in the contractual sense or that any demand had been made for repayment of the principal. The assessee had not taken legal steps to recall the loans, and there was nothing to show that the advances satisfied the definition of non-performing asset under the RBI Directions. The applicable prudential norms could not displace the income-tax principle of accrual where the assessee followed the mercantile system. The Revenue also showed that the borrowers had treated the interest as payable and had deducted tax at source, supporting accrual. The principle of real income was not attracted on these facts, and the RBI norms could not override the statutory charge under the Income-tax Act.
Conclusion: The interest income had accrued and was taxable on accrual basis. The assessee's claim based on RBI prudential norms was rejected, and the deletion of the addition was held to be incorrect.