Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail in view of the bar under Section 59A(i) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915, when the record disclosed an offence under Section 34(1)(a) involving more than five bulk litres of liquor.
Analysis: The applicant was named in the FIR, the motorcycle owned by him was seized in connection with transport of 17.28 bulk litres of country-made liquor, and the investigation was at an initial stage. On these facts, the material on record did not show that the ingredients of Section 34(1)(a) were completely absent. Since the alleged offence fell within the class of cases covered by Section 59A(i), the statutory bar against entertaining an anticipatory bail application was attracted.
Conclusion: The application for anticipatory bail was not maintainable and the request for bail was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the record discloses a prima facie offence under Section 34(1)(a) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915 involving liquor quantity exceeding the statutory threshold, Section 59A(i) bars entertainment of an anticipatory bail application.