Tribunal dismisses Revenue's appeal on warranty expenses, software charges, and peripherals depreciation; partly allows appeal on Section 14A.

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding the deletion of disallowances for provision of warranty expenses, software service charges, and depreciation on computer peripherals/accessories. However, the appeal was partly allowed on the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A, directing the AO to re-examine the issue. The order was pronounced on 23/03/2015.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of disallowance of provision for warranty expenses.
2. Deletion of disallowance of software service charges.
3. Deletion of disallowance of depreciation on computer peripherals/accessories.
4. Deletion of disallowance by applying provisions of Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

Ground No. 1: Deletion of Disallowance of Provision for Warranty Expenses
The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 4,00,978/- for warranty expenses, arguing that it was an unascertained liability. The assessee countered by citing previous assessment orders for AY 2005-06 and 2006-07, where similar expenses were allowed, and referenced the ITAT Delhi's decision for AY 2008-09, which upheld the allowance of such expenses. The Tribunal noted that the warranty expenses were based on technical estimates and past experience, and were inextricably linked to sales, making them a committed liability. Thus, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's ground.

Ground No. 2: Deletion of Disallowance of Software Service Charges
The Revenue argued that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 12,38,26,881/- for software service charges due to lack of details provided by the assessee. The assessee maintained that there was no basis for the AO's ad hoc disallowance of 50% of the charges, and pointed out that similar disallowances in AY 2005-06 were overturned by the CIT(A). The CIT(A) admitted relevant documents under Rule 46A and verified that the payments were made to a Korean company through banking channels after deducting TDS. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that the expenses were genuine and found no justification for the AO's ad hoc disallowance, thus dismissing the Revenue's ground.

Ground No. 3: Deletion of Disallowance of Depreciation on Computer Peripherals/Accessories
The Revenue accepted that the issue was covered by the Delhi High Court's decision in CIT vs. BSES Rajdhani Powers Ltd., which supported the assessee's claim for a higher depreciation rate of 60% on computer peripherals/accessories. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's ground.

Ground No. 4: Deletion of Disallowance by Applying Provisions of Section 14A
The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance under Section 14A. The assessee referred to the ITAT's decision for AY 2008-09, which restored the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal noted that the AO must ascertain the correctness of the assessee's claim regarding expenditure related to income not forming part of total income, as per the Delhi High Court's decision in Maxopp Investment Ltd. vs. CIT. The Tribunal restored the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication, following the same approach as in AY 2008-09, thus allowing the Revenue's ground for statistical purposes.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on grounds 1, 2, and 3, and partly allowed the appeal on ground 4 for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the issue under Section 14A. The order was pronounced in the open Court on 23/03/2015.

---