Predeposit compliance limits appellate jurisdiction and requires remand for merits, not Tribunal adjudication at that stage.

The Tribunal's jurisdiction was confined to the dismissal of the assessee's appeal for non-compliance with the predeposit condition, so it could examine only that requirement and the consequence of default. Once the predeposit was complied with, the proper course was to restore the matter to the first appellate authority for adjudication on merits. The Tribunal could not bypass the statutory appellate structure and decide the assessment dispute on merits at that stage. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter was remitted to the first appellate authority for a merits decision.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in deciding the appeal on merits instead of confining itself to the question of predeposit and remanding the matter to the first appellate authority after the predeposit condition had been complied with.

Analysis: The appeal before the Tribunal arose only from the order of the first appellate authority dismissing the assessee's appeal for non-compliance with the predeposit condition. In such a situation, the Tribunal's jurisdiction was limited to examining the correctness of the predeposit requirement and the consequence of non-compliance. Once the condition of predeposit stood satisfied, the proper course was to restore the matter to the first appellate authority for adjudication on merits. The Tribunal could not bypass the statutory appellate structure and enter into the merits of the assessment dispute at that stage.

Conclusion: The Tribunal was not justified in deciding the appeal on merits. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was restored to the first appellate authority for decision on merits.

---