Land not transferred to stock-in-trade, no income from Development Agreement.

The Tribunal held that the land owned by FK was converted into stock-in-trade in 2005, no transfer of land occurred as per relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, and no income accrued from the Development Agreement (DA) in the financial year 2007-08. Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the Assessing Officer was directed to delete the computed capital gains.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the land owned by FK is a 'capital asset' or was converted into stock-in-trade.
2. Whether there was a transfer of land within the meaning of provisions of section 2(47)(v) and section 2(47)(vi) of the Income Tax Act.
3. Whether any income can be said to have accrued to FK when the amount of sale consideration could not be determined as per the terms of the Development Agreement (DA).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether the land owned by FK is a 'capital asset' or was converted into stock-in-trade:
The Tribunal examined various documents and steps undertaken by the assessee to determine if the land was converted into stock-in-trade. The land was initially agricultural and converted to non-agricultural use in 2005. The assessee undertook several steps including filing applications with the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA), incurring expenses on construction of a compound wall, and seeking various approvals for residential development. The Tribunal found that these steps collectively established that the land was converted into stock-in-trade in April 2005, not in the financial year 2007-08 as claimed by the Assessing Officer (AO). The Tribunal noted that mere entries in the books of account are not conclusive, and the true nature of the transaction must be determined from the total facts and circumstances of the case.

2. Whether there was a transfer of land within the meaning of provisions of section 2(47)(v) and section 2(47)(vi) of the Income Tax Act:
The Tribunal held that for section 2(47)(v) to apply, the land must be a 'capital asset'. Since the land was converted into stock-in-trade in 2005, it no longer remained a capital asset. The Tribunal also found that the Development Agreement (DA) did not result in a transfer of possession as per section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, because the DA was not registered, and the possession of the land continued with the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the AO had wrongly invoked section 2(47)(v) and section 2(47)(vi) because these sections apply to capital assets and specific entities like cooperative societies, companies, or AOPs, which were not applicable in this case.

3. Whether any income can be said to have accrued to FK when the amount of sale consideration could not be determined as per the terms of the Development Agreement (DA):
The Tribunal found that no income accrued to the assessee as the consideration from the DA was not ascertainable. The DA provided only a benchmark for sharing profits and adjusting the deposit of Rs. 13.75 crores paid by Godrej Properties Ltd. (GPL). The Tribunal noted that no villas were constructed or sold pursuant to the DA, and the DA was annulled in 2011. Therefore, there was no transfer of land or accrual of income in the financial year 2007-08. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the capital gains computed in the hands of the assessee.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the land was converted into stock-in-trade in 2005, there was no transfer of land as per section 2(47)(v) and section 2(47)(vi), and no income accrued to the assessee from the DA. The appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the AO was directed to delete the capital gains.

---