Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital gains arising from a development agreement were taxable in the assessment year in which the agreement was executed, or only in the year when the developed area due to the landowner was actually handed over.
Analysis: The agreement was treated as a development agreement-cum-general power of attorney under which the developer was given only permissive possession and the consideration to the owner was the allotted share in the developed area. The decisive factor was whether the arrangement satisfied the conditions of part performance so as to attract deemed transfer under Section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, read with Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. On the facts found, the developer had not undertaken the development work, no construction approval had been obtained, no developed area had been delivered, and the consideration in the form of constructed share had not accrued to the assessee. Mere execution of the agreement and receipt of a refundable deposit were held insufficient to constitute taxable transfer or receipt of consideration for capital gains purposes.
Conclusion: Capital gains were not taxable in the year of execution of the development agreement; the addition was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.