Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in an application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the question framed on the basis of section 147(b) could be said to arise out of the Tribunal's order, where the Revenue's case before the authorities was founded on section 147(a) read with section 148 and the alternative plea under section 147(b) was raised for the first time at the reference stage.
Analysis: The Revenue had proceeded throughout on the footing that reopening was justified under section 147(a) read with section 148. The proposed question, however, was framed on section 147(b), which was not the basis on which reassessment had been initiated or communicated to the assessee. A contention first advanced at the stage of reference, and not forming part of the foundation of the reassessment proceedings or the Tribunal's adjudication, could not be treated as a question arising from the Tribunal's order. The Tribunal was therefore justified in declining to permit that alternative basis to be raised at that stage, and the proposed question did not satisfy the requirement of section 256(2).
Conclusion: The question based on section 147(b) did not arise out of the Tribunal's order and the application for reference was not maintainable.