Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in assessments of agricultural income of a non-resident owner, the agent can be proceeded against as the statutory assessee and whether the principal owner remains liable for recovery of the assessed tax.
Analysis: Section 11 of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950 authorises assessment of the agricultural income of a non-resident either in the name of the owner or in the name of the agent. Once notice under section 11(2) is served, the agent is treated as the assessee for the purposes of the Act and may be proceeded against for assessment and recovery. The provision is intended to avoid the difficulty of pursuing an owner who is abroad, but it does not extinguish the substantive liability of the owner. The agent is made liable in addition to the principal, and the charge on agricultural income continues to attach to the person deriving it through the agent. The disputed question whether the particular person managing the estate was the agent was treated as a factual controversy not fit for determination in these proceedings.
Conclusion: The assessments and the recovery proceedings against the petitioner were held valid, and the challenge to quash them was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Under section 11 of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950, service of notice on the agent enables assessment and recovery against the agent as statutory assessee, but the non-resident principal's liability is not extinguished.