Tribunal Upholds CIT(A)'s Decision on TP Adjustment Calculation, Stresses Consistency

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to reduce the TP adjustment by excluding the cost of goods received free of cost for mark-up calculation, aligning with the preceding year's approach. Emphasizing consistency, the Tribunal affirmed the importance of uniform treatment in TP adjustment calculations across assessment years, in line with the principle of maintaining consistency and uniformity in transfer pricing adjustments.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. TP adjustment calculation based on cost of goods received free of cost.
2. Application of TNMM method for benchmarking.
3. Consistency in TP adjustment calculation across assessment years.

Analysis:

Issue 1: TP adjustment calculation based on cost of goods received free of cost
The appeal by the Revenue challenged the reduction of the cost of goods received free of cost from the total cost of goods, leading to a 6% mark-up on the reduced amount. The contention was that excluding the cost of raw material would distort results and the Berry ratio was not suitable for manufacturers. The Tribunal noted the TPO's calculation of TP adjustment at Rs. 2,33,24,680 based on a 6% mark-up on the total cost incurred. However, the CIT(A) recalculated the adjustment to Rs. 1,78,64,680 by excluding the value of raw material, aligning with the approach taken in the preceding year. The Revenue argued against this relief, stating the raw material value should not be excluded for mark-up calculation.

Issue 2: Application of TNMM method for benchmarking
The assessee company engaged in manufacturing had international transactions, and the TNMM method was adopted for benchmarking. The TPO applied a 6% mark-up on the cost incurred, including raw material supplied free of cost. The CIT(A) considered the approach taken in the previous year where the raw material value was excluded for mark-up calculation, leading to a reduced TP adjustment. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing consistency in treatment and adherence to the principle of uniformity in TP adjustments.

Issue 3: Consistency in TP adjustment calculation across assessment years
The Tribunal highlighted the importance of consistency in TP adjustment calculations across assessment years. It referenced a previous year's TP adjustment calculation where the cost of goods received free of cost was excluded for mark-up computation, resulting in a 6% margin on the remaining cost. The Tribunal refused to interfere with the relief granted by the CIT(A), emphasizing the need for uniform treatment when facts and circumstances remain the same, as per the decision in CIT vs. Gopal Purohit.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision to reduce the TP adjustment based on the consistent treatment of excluding the cost of goods received free of cost for mark-up calculation, in line with the approach taken in the preceding year. The judgment highlighted the significance of maintaining uniformity and consistency in TP adjustments across assessment years.

---