Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in relation to a plot in a co-operative housing society that had been forfeited under SAFEMA, the Society could refuse the Central Government's request to have the plot transferred and whether the matter could be resolved by identifying a purchaser and transferring the plot to a qualified member.
Analysis: The plot was held in the setting of a co-operative housing society where the society retained ownership of the land and the member had rights in the superstructure and allied incident rights. The forfeiture order was treated as vesting in the Central Government all rights and title that the member actually enjoyed in the property, but not any right the member never possessed. The pleadings also showed that both sides were willing to facilitate a sale to an intending purchaser, provided the society's by-laws and legal dues were satisfied. In that background, the Court found it appropriate to direct the respondents to identify a purchaser, permit the petitioners to suggest buyers, and require a joint application to the Society once the sale was finalized.
Conclusion: The petition was disposed of with directions facilitating sale of the forfeited plot and transfer in favour of a qualified purchaser who is admitted as a member of the Society, subject to payment of lawful dues and transfer charges.