Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether hospital equipment imported by a person other than the hospital was eligible for exemption under Sl. No. 362 of Notification No. 21/2002-Customs read with Condition No. 77 when the equipment was meant for use in specified hospitals.
Analysis: The exemption entry covered hospital equipment for use in specified hospitals, and Condition No. 77 required that the importer produce the prescribed certificate and that the head of the hospital certify that the equipment was meant for use in the hospital and was essential for its running or maintenance. The use of the term "importer" in clause (b) indicated that import by a person other than the hospital was not excluded. The notification did not support the restrictive reading urged by the Revenue, and the certificates required by the condition had been furnished.
Conclusion: The exemption was available even when the equipment was imported by a person other than the hospital, provided the prescribed conditions were satisfied. The Revenue's appeals were therefore not sustainable.