Appeal granted for exemption under section 54F

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, directing that the exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act be granted. The Tribunal found the purchased property to be a habitable residential house, meeting the conditions for exemption, despite the Assessing Officer's disallowance. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of official documents over local enquiries and photographs taken post-purchase. The decision was based on evidence presented by the assessee and a precedent in a similar case, leading to the allowance of the exemption claimed.

---

---

Issues:
- Denial of exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
The case involved an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the denial of exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2008-09. The assessee, a medical practitioner, had declared total income of Rs. 27,22,500, but the assessment determined the income at Rs. 1,03,25,814 by rejecting the claim for exemption. The assessee had sold a site and purchased a residential property, claiming exemption under section 54F instead of section 54. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, which was upheld by the CIT (Appeals).

The Tribunal analyzed the evidence presented by the assessee, including the sale deed, property tax receipts, and other documents. It was noted that the purchased property included a 200 sq. ft. RCC house with civic amenities, contradicting the Assessing Officer's claim that it was a vacant site. The Tribunal found that the property was habitable at the time of purchase, and the conditions for exemption under section 54F were met. The Tribunal referred to a previous decision in a similar case and directed that the exemption claimed by the assessee be allowed.

The Tribunal disagreed with the Assessing Officer's reliance on local enquiries and photographs taken years after the purchase, as they did not override the facts recorded in official documents. The Tribunal also distinguished a cited case where the building was deemed uninhabitable, emphasizing that section 54F does not specify the quality or income-generating status of the residential house. Additionally, a decision cited by the Departmental Representative was deemed inapplicable as it pertained to a different section of the Act and lacked similarity to the current case's facts.

Ultimately, the Tribunal found the evidence provided by the assessee sufficient to establish the existence of a residential house on the purchased property, fulfilling the conditions for exemption under section 54F. Relying on a precedent, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, directing that the exemption be granted. The decision was pronounced in open court on 05.10.2012.

---