Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest income relatable to non-performing assets, in the case of a co-operative bank not covered by section 43D, could be brought to tax on accrual basis despite RBI prudential norms.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the principle of accrual of income and the effect of RBI prudential norms governing income recognition. Section 43D was not applicable to the assessee, a co-operative bank not falling within the specified category of scheduled banks. The Tribunal followed the view that, in the absence of jurisdictional authority and in the face of divergent non-jurisdictional decisions, the view favourable to the assessee should prevail. It relied on the principle that interest on NPA advances does not accrue where recovery itself is doubtful, and therefore the revenue cannot be recognized as accrued income merely because mercantile accounting is followed. The Tribunal also noted that RBI directions on income recognition have overriding force in the matter of recognizing such income.
Conclusion: The addition of interest income on NPAs was rightly deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.