ITAT Decision: Partial win for assessee in appeal involving depreciation, disallowance, and membership fee.

The ITAT partly allowed the assessee's appeal in ITA 168 of 2011, upholding the disallowance of depreciation on the BSE Card and foreign exchange loss but allowing depreciation on customer rights, bad debts, VSAT, Vanda loss, and goodwill. The ITAT also directed a reasonable disallowance under Section 14A and allowed the membership fee. The revenue's appeal in ITA 1029 of 2011 was also partly allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of depreciation on BSE Card.
2. Disallowance of foreign exchange loss.
3. Disallowance of non-compete fees.
4. Disallowance of depreciation on customer rights.
5. Deletion of additions on bad debts.
6. Allowance of depreciation on VSAT.
7. Treatment of Vanda loss.
8. Disallowance under Section 14A.
9. Depreciation on non-compete fees.
10. Depreciation on goodwill.
11. Allowance of membership fee.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Depreciation on BSE Card:
The assessee, a stockbroker, claimed depreciation of Rs. 24,58,957 on the BSE Card, which was disallowed by the AO. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance, citing the demutualization of BSE, which changed the nature of the asset. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing Sino Securities (P) Ltd. vs ITO, determining that the demutualization resulted in the cessation of the block of assets.

2. Disallowance of Foreign Exchange Loss:
The assessee claimed a foreign exchange loss of Rs. 24,149, which was disallowed by the AO as contingent in nature. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance. However, the ITAT, referencing the Supreme Court decision in CIT vs Woodward Governor India Pvt Ltd, ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition.

3. Disallowance of Non-Compete Fees:
The assessee treated non-compete fees of Rs. 6,53,57,094 as revenue expenditure. The CIT(A) treated it as capital expenditure. The ITAT, referencing decisions in Hidelberg Cement India Ltd. vs Add. CIT and CIT vs Everest Advertising, determined that since the non-compete fee was for one year, it should be treated as revenue expenditure and directed the AO to delete the addition.

4. Disallowance of Depreciation on Customer Rights:
The assessee claimed depreciation on customer rights amounting to Rs. 1,70,88,082. The revenue authorities disallowed it, treating the transaction as sham. The ITAT, referencing India Capital Markets P Ltd. v DCIT and SKS Micro Finance Ltd v DCIT, held that customer rights fall within the inclusions of section 32(1)(ii) and directed the AO to allow the depreciation.

5. Deletion of Additions on Bad Debts:
The AO disallowed bad debts of Rs. 78,91,360 claimed by the assessee. The CIT(A) allowed the claim, referencing the ITAT Special Bench decision in Shreyas Morakhia. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting the Bombay High Court's acceptance of the Special Bench's decision in Shreyas S Morakhia.

6. Allowance of Depreciation on VSAT:
The CIT(A) allowed depreciation on VSAT, treating it as part of the computer system. The ITAT upheld this decision, referencing prior decisions in the assessee's own cases for earlier assessment years.

7. Treatment of Vanda Loss:
The AO treated Vanda loss of Rs. 1,95,84,164 as speculative loss under section 73. The CIT(A) treated it as business loss. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing decisions in ACIT v/s Subhash Chand Shorewala and Parker Securities Ltd vs DCIT, determining that Vanda transactions are integral to the brokerage business and not speculative.

8. Disallowance under Section 14A:
The CIT(A) directed the AO to make a reasonable disallowance under Section 14A, following the Bombay High Court guidelines in Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. vs DCIT. The ITAT upheld this direction, remanding the issue to the AO for computation as per the guidelines.

9. Depreciation on Non-Compete Fees:
Since the ITAT held the non-compete fee to be revenue in nature in the assessee's appeal, the issue of depreciation on non-compete fees became infructuous, and the ITAT rejected the ground raised by the department.

10. Depreciation on Goodwill:
The CIT(A) allowed depreciation on goodwill. The ITAT upheld this decision, referencing the Supreme Court decision in CIT vs Smiffs Securities Ltd., confirming the allowance of depreciation on goodwill.

11. Allowance of Membership Fee:
The AO disallowed the membership fee of Rs. 33,50,000, treating it as capital expenditure. The CIT(A) reversed this finding. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing decisions in ACIT vs Baphana Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. and Otis Elevators Co (India) Ltd. vs CIT, determining that membership fee is revenue expenditure.

Conclusion:
- Assessee's appeal in ITA 168 of 2011 stands partly allowed.
- Revenue's appeal in ITA 1029 of 2011 stands partly allowed.

---