Just a moment...
AI-powered research trained on the authentic TaxTMI database.
Launch AI Search →Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Indian Supreme Court dismisses Special Leave Petitions in Appeal No. ITA 1102/2011, affirming High Court decision.</h1> The Supreme Court of India dismissed the Special Leave Petitions in Appeal No. ITA 1102/2011 against the High Court decision (2014 (4) TMI 682 - DELHI ... Grant of special leave - judicial interference in High Court orders - absence of legal or valid ground for interference - condonation of delayGrant of special leave - absence of legal or valid ground for interference - judicial interference in High Court orders - condonation of delay - Special Leave Petitions dismissed for lack of any legal or valid ground for interference with the High Court order. - HELD THAT: - The Court heard learned counsel for the parties, considered the material on record and, after condoning the delay, found no legal or valid ground warranting interference with the impugned High Court decision. No separate reasoning or novel legal principle was articulated; the petition was dismissed on the basis that the requisite grounds for exercise of the Court's discretionary jurisdiction were absent.Special Leave Petitions dismissed; delay condoned.Final Conclusion: The Special Leave Petitions against the High Court order stand dismissed for want of any legal or valid ground for interference; delay in filing was condoned. The Supreme Court of India dismissed the Special Leave Petitions in Appeal No. ITA 1102/2011 against the High Court decision (2014 (4) TMI 682 - DELHI HIGH COURT). Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Rohinton Fali Nariman heard the case. The delay was condoned, and no legal grounds for interference were found.