Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether receipts from offshore supply and the Revenue's royalty and fees for technical services objections required fresh computation under the presumptive regime; (ii) whether service tax receipts formed part of gross receipts for computing income under section 44BB; (iii) whether interest under section 234B was leviable in full.
Issue (i): whether receipts from offshore supply and the Revenue's royalty and fees for technical services objections required fresh computation under the presumptive regime.
Analysis: The appeals on this question were treated as covered by the Tribunal's earlier decision in the assessee's own case for the preceding assessment years. The matter was not finally quantified in the present year, and the assessment was directed to be recomputed in the light of the earlier findings, including attribution of income to the extent of operations relating to sales carried out in India.
Conclusion: The issue was sent back to the Assessing Officer for recomputation in accordance with the earlier Tribunal ruling, with no final determination of the quantified income in this order.
Issue (ii): whether service tax receipts formed part of gross receipts for computing income under section 44BB.
Analysis: Service tax was treated as a statutory levy and not as an amount carrying any profit element. Following the earlier Tribunal view and the jurisdictional High Court decision, such statutory tax collections were held to lie outside the receipts on which deemed income under section 44BB is computed.
Conclusion: Service tax receipts were held not includible in gross receipts for section 44BB purposes, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iii): whether interest under section 234B was leviable in full.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier order in the assessee's own case, which held the levy to be compensatory and not chargeable for certain contracts, while sustaining it for contracts where income had arisen in India. The matter therefore required recomputation consistent with that earlier partial allowance.
Conclusion: Interest under section 234B was held to be chargeable only to the limited extent earlier indicated, and the levy was otherwise not sustained in full.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were not fully accepted or rejected on the merits and were disposed of with a partial remand for recomputation, while the cross-objection was rejected as infructuous.