TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT: Unregistered Entities Cannot Claim Credit Pre-Registration</h1> <h3>PITHAMPUR TOOLS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., INDORE</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appeal as the credit sought by the unregistered appellant for a period before registration under the ... CENVAT Credit - Availment before registration - Held that:- Commissioner (Appeals) in para 5.1 of his order has brought out that credit sought to be availed by the appellant pertains to the period prior to registration under Central Excise Act, 1944. He is correct in his decision in Para 5.3 of his order for the reason that credit which has never met scrutiny under law should not entitle the un-registered respondent to the credit who availed the same prior to registration - Decided against assesse. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appeal as the credit sought by the unregistered appellant pertained to a period before registration under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) that such credit should not be availed by an unregistered entity.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
