Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the release deed by which the assessee and his wife relinquished their life interest in property amounted to a transfer of property or a gift under the Gift-tax Act, and whether, in the alternative, it constituted a deemed gift as a bona fide relinquishment.
Analysis: The release deed was treated as a unilateral relinquishment of life interest. On the statutory scheme as it stood for the relevant assessment year, the Court read section 2(xii) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 and section 2(xxiv) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 together and held that such a self-effacing surrender did not fall within the expressions "gift" or "transfer of property" then in force. The Court also relied on the legislative history introduced by the Finance Act, 1980, particularly the insertion of section 4(1)(e) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 and the corresponding amendment to section 2(xxiv), to hold that the later provision showed that transactions of this kind were not previously covered by the earlier text. Since the Tribunal had found the transaction to be bona fide, section 4(1)(c) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 was also inapplicable.
Conclusion: The release deed was not a taxable gift, was not a transfer of property within the pre-amendment Act, and was not a deemed gift under section 4(1)(c); the answer was in favour of the assessee.