Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's transfer of plots to a partnership firm amounted to a taxable gift, and whether the valuation adopted by the Gift-tax Officer could stand in the face of the registered valuer's report and the statutory procedure for reference to a Valuation Officer.
Analysis: The return value of the plots was supported by a registered valuer's estimate. The statutory scheme under section 15(6) required the Gift-tax Officer, where he was dissatisfied with such value, to make a proper reference to the Valuation Officer and follow the prescribed procedure. The valuation relied upon by the revenue was taken from wealth-tax proceedings conducted at an earlier stage and could not be substituted for compliance with the Gift-tax Act procedure. The officer also did not follow the Board's instructions governing such references. In these circumstances, the assessee's disclosed value was accepted and the higher valuation was rejected.
Conclusion: The plots had to be valued at Rs. 82,000, the provisions dealing with deemed gift on inadequate consideration were not attracted, and no gift chargeable to gift-tax arose from the transaction.