Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether export benefits were liable to be denied on the ground that the declared FOB value included agency commission and was allegedly inflated, and whether the Board and RBI circulars permitted grant of export incentives on the full FOB value.
Analysis: The exports were made under direct contracts with foreign buyers on the basis of open tenders, and the consideration declared in the shipping bills matched the tender value and the remittances received. The circulars relied upon by the Revenue permitted export benefits on FOB value without deduction of agency commission up to 12.5% of FOB value, and only commission exceeding that limit required deduction. On the facts found, no fraud or inflation of export value was established, and the circulars applied to permit the benefit claimed.
Conclusion: The challenge to the grant of export incentives failed, and the Revenue's appeals were rejected.
Final Conclusion: The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld, and the export benefits claimed by the assessee were held to be correctly allowed.