Appeal admitted challenging suspension order delay by CESTAT, raising substantial law questions. Respondent waived service. The High Court of Bombay admitted an appeal challenging the setting aside of a suspension order by CESTAT due to a delay in issuance. The appeal raised ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal admitted challenging suspension order delay by CESTAT, raising substantial law questions. Respondent waived service.
The High Court of Bombay admitted an appeal challenging the setting aside of a suspension order by CESTAT due to a delay in issuance. The appeal raised substantial questions of law concerning the delay and the seriousness of the fraud committed by the Customs House Agent. The Respondent waived service.
The High Court of Bombay heard an appeal regarding the setting aside of a suspension order by CESTAT due to a 13-day delay in issuing the order without considering the seriousness of the fraud committed by the Customs House Agent. The court admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law related to the delay and the merit of the case. The Respondent waived service.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.