Court emphasizes allotment letter date over registration for property acquisition under Income Tax Act, upholding Circular No.471.

The Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding the determination of the date of property acquisition under Section 2(42A) of the Income Tax Act. It upheld the significance of the date of allotment letter over the registration date, following Circular No.471. The Court emphasized that the allotment letter establishes property rights, with possession being secondary. The decision aligned with previous interpretations, stating that breach of agreement only entitles enforcement of property rights. The holding period for capital gains was based on the allotment date, not possession delivery, as per the Court's ruling, affirming the Tribunal's decision.

---

---

Issues:
1. Determination of the date of acquisition of property under Section 2(42A) of the Income Tax Act.
2. Computation of holding period for capital gains based on the date of allotment letter versus the date of delivery of possession.

Issue 1: Determination of the date of acquisition of property under Section 2(42A) of the Income Tax Act:
The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the date of acquisition of property. The assessee purchased an undivided share of land and entered into an agreement with a builder for construction. The dispute arose when the Assessing Officer considered the date of registration of the land as the purchase date, leading to the assessment of short-term capital gains. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the appeal based on Circular No.471 dated 15.10.1986, which emphasized the significance of the date of allotment letter in determining the date of acquisition. The Tribunal upheld this view, considering the date of allotment as crucial, not the date of sale deed. The Court concurred with this interpretation, dismissing the appeal by the Revenue.

Issue 2: Computation of holding period for capital gains based on the date of allotment letter versus the date of delivery of possession:
The Tribunal relied on decisions of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, emphasizing that the allotment letter confers the right to hold the property, and subsequent acts like possession delivery are consequential. The Court noted that the right to the property stems from the agreement date with the builder, not the possession date. The Circular highlighted that the allotment letter signifies the title transfer, with possession being a formality. The Court endorsed this view, stating that the breach of agreement only entitles the beneficiary to enforce property rights. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the date of allotment determines the acquisition date for computing capital gains, aligning with the Circular and previous judicial interpretations.

This comprehensive analysis of the judgment highlights the key legal issues, the factual background, the arguments presented, and the final decision rendered by the Court, providing a detailed understanding of the case.

---