Period of holding for flat starts from allotment date, making gains long-term and Section 54 exemption available

HC held that for purposes of determining long-term capital gains under Sections 2(14), 2(29A), and 2(42A), the period of holding begins from the date of allotment of the flat, not from the date of possession or assignment of a specific flat number. Relying on CBDT Circular No. 471, the HC ruled that title accrues on issuance of the allotment letter and subsequent instalment payments are only consequential. As the assessee held the allotment/right in the flat for more than 36 months before sale, the gain was a long-term capital gain and eligible for exemption under Section 54.

---

---

Issues:
1. Interpretation of provisions of Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding capital gains exemption.
2. Determination of whether the capital gain arising from the sale of a flat qualifies as long term capital gain.
3. Assessment of eligibility for exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act.

Analysis:

1. The appeal was filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the assessment year 1989-90. The assessing officer disallowed the exemption claimed by the appellant-assessee under Section 2(29A) of the Act, stating that the case fell under short term capital gain as per Section 2(42A). The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) partly accepted the appeal, but the Tribunal dismissed it.

2. The primary issue was whether the capital gain on the sale of a flat allotted on 27.2.1982, sold on 6.1.1989, and possession taken on 15.5.1986, qualified as long term capital gain. The assessee argued that the transaction was completed in 1982, making it a long term capital gain. The counsel relied on relevant statutory provisions and Circular No.471 dated 15.10.1986 to support the claim.

3. The Court considered the definitions of capital asset, long term capital asset, and short term capital asset under Sections 2(14), 2(29A), and 2(42A) of the Act. It also referred to Circular No.471, which clarified the treatment of capital gains tax in cases of flat allotment under the Self-Financing Scheme of the Delhi Development Authority. The Court emphasized that the right of the assessee in the property existed before the possession was delivered, supporting the claim of long term capital gain.

4. The Court analyzed previous case law and distinguished the case of Smt. Beena K. Jain, where the claim under Section 54F was upheld. In the present case, the Court concluded that the provisions of Sections 2(14), 2(29A), and 2(42A) covered cases where the asset was held by the assessee. As the assessee was allotted the flat in 1982 and had possession in 1986, the gain qualified as long term capital gain. Consequently, the substantial question of law was answered in favor of the assessee, and the appeal was allowed.

---