Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1987 (3) TMI 39 - HC - Wealth-tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court rules on classification of gold ornaments; The court determined that gold ornaments without precious or semi-precious stones were not classified as 'jewellery' under Section 5(1)(viii) of the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Court rules on classification of gold ornaments;

                          The court determined that gold ornaments without precious or semi-precious stones were not classified as "jewellery" under Section 5(1)(viii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, for periods preceding April 1, 1972. Explanation I, which extended the definition to include such ornaments, was held to have prospective application from April 1, 1972. The judgment favored the assessee, ruling against retrospective application and entailing no costs.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Definition of "jewellery" under Section 5(1)(viii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
                          2. Retrospective vs. prospective application of Explanation I to Section 5(1)(viii).

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Definition of "Jewellery" under Section 5(1)(viii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957:
                          The primary issue was to determine what constitutes "jewellery" under Section 5(1)(viii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The assessee argued that her gold ornaments, not studded with precious or semi-precious stones, were exempt from wealth-tax. The Wealth-tax Officer disagreed, but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal sided with the assessee. The court was tasked with interpreting whether gold ornaments without stones fell under the term "jewellery".

                          2. Retrospective vs. Prospective Application of Explanation I to Section 5(1)(viii):
                          The court examined whether Explanation I, which defines "jewellery" to include ornaments made of precious metals with or without stones, applied retrospectively from April 1, 1963, or prospectively from April 1, 1972. The Revenue argued for retrospective application, while the assessee contended for a prospective application.

                          Court's Findings:

                          On the Definition of "Jewellery":
                          The court analyzed various judicial decisions and dictionary definitions. The Oxford English Dictionary and New Webster's English Dictionary provided two potential meanings for "jewellery": one derived from "jewel" (suggesting the inclusion of precious stones) and another from "jeweller" (suggesting any ornament made by a jeweller, including those without stones).

                          On Retrospective vs. Prospective Application:
                          The court noted that the words "but not including jewellery" were inserted retrospectively from April 1, 1963, but Explanation I was added prospectively from April 1, 1972. The court disagreed with the Allahabad High Court's view that Explanation I was merely clarifying what was implicit from the beginning. Instead, it held that the Legislature intended the definition in Explanation I to apply only from April 1, 1972, as indicated by the contemporaneous exposition in the Central Board of Direct Taxes' circular.

                          Supporting Judgments:
                          - Gujarat High Court (CWT v. Jayantilal Amratlal): Held that ornaments studded with jewels were included in the definition of "jewellery" even before Explanation I.
                          - Calcutta High Court (CWT v. Aditya Vikram Birla): Found that "jewellery" in popular parlance implied the inclusion of stones, and thus, Explanation I extended the meaning prospectively.
                          - Punjab and Haryana High Court (Meera Jaiswal v. CWT): Agreed that gold ornaments without stones were not "jewellery" before April 1, 1972.
                          - Madhya Pradesh High Court (CWT v. Smt. Tarabai Kanakmal): Concluded that the word "jewellery" did not cover all ornaments and that Explanation I was intended to widen the meaning prospectively.
                          - Delhi High Court (CWT v. Smt. Savitri Devi): Contrarily, held that "jewellery" included gold ornaments based on the ordinary meaning.

                          Conclusion:
                          The court concluded that the word "jewellery" in Section 5(1)(viii) did not include gold ornaments without precious or semi-precious stones for the period prior to April 1, 1972. The question was answered in the negative, favoring the assessee, and no costs were ordered.

                          Summary:
                          The judgment clarified that for assessment years before April 1, 1972, gold ornaments not containing precious stones were not considered "jewellery" under Section 5(1)(viii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. Explanation I to this section, which included such ornaments in the definition of "jewellery", applied only prospectively from April 1, 1972.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found