Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed for failure to furnish an estimate of advance tax under section 273(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was invalid because of the renumbering of the relevant provisions with effect from 1 June 1978 and because the assessment year was 1976-77.
Analysis: The relevant statutory obligation to furnish an estimate of advance tax and the consequences for default remained materially the same before and after the amendment that took effect from 1 June 1978. The change was only a regrouping and renumbering of provisions, with section 212(3) becoming section 209A(1) and section 273(b) becoming section 273(1)(b). For assessment year 1976-77, the applicable law was the law in force on 1 April 1976, or at any rate the law in force when the default was committed. The subsequent renumbering did not curtail the power to levy penalty for the default.
Conclusion: The penalty was validly imposed and sustained; the question referred was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A subsequent renumbering or regrouping of statutory provisions does not affect liability for penalty where the substantive obligation and penal consequence remain unchanged, and the law applicable is the law in force on the first day of the assessment year or at the time of default.