Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee association was established for the advancement of an object of general public utility not involving the carrying on of any activity for profit, and was therefore entitled to exemption under section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The controlling test is whether the predominant object of the activity is to subserve a charitable purpose or to earn profit. Section 2(15) qualifies only the limb relating to the advancement of any other object of general public utility. If the dominant purpose is charitable, the mere fact that the activity yields some surplus does not take the case out of charity. On the facts, the association's main object was to promote, encourage and protect the interests of persons engaged in banking and pawnbroking, with the remaining objects being incidental. The association was also bound by its constitution to apply its income and property only towards its objects, without distribution of profits to members.
Conclusion: The association satisfied the requirement of advancement of general public utility without a profit motive and was entitled to exemption under section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purposes of section 2(15), the decisive inquiry is the predominant object of the activity; if that object is charitable or for the general public utility, incidental profit does not destroy the exemption.