Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the importer was entitled to provisional release and clearance of the imported second hand digital multifunction print and copying machines pending adjudication, notwithstanding the restriction under the Foreign Trade Policy and the stand taken under the Customs Act and the Hazardous Wastes Rules.
Analysis: The imported goods were treated as restricted under the Foreign Trade Policy and were also sought to be proceeded against as prohibited goods under the Customs Act and the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act. The legal framework recognised confiscation for prohibited or improperly imported goods, but it also provided for provisional release under Section 110A of the Customs Act, redemption in lieu of confiscation under Section 125 of the Customs Act and Section 11(9) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2007 required action by the authorities competent under those Rules before any direction for re-export could be made, and no such proceedings had been initiated. In the absence of action by the competent authority under the Hazardous Wastes Rules, and since provisional release was available under the customs regime, refusal to release the goods was not justified.
Conclusion: The importer was entitled to provisional release of the goods upon payment of applicable customs duties and charges, subject to the eventual adjudication.