Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deployment of additional police force by Mumbai Police under the Mumbai Police Act, 1951 was prima facie a sovereign/statutory function outside the scope of Security Agency Services for the purpose of waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The provisions relating to deployment of additional police force indicated that the activity was connected with maintenance of peace, preservation of order and law and order, and the charges collected were credited to the Consolidated Fund of the State. These features supported the view that the activity was statutory and sovereign in nature. The issue whether such services could nevertheless be treated as taxable security services was considered a triable issue, and the cited Tribunal and High Court decisions also supported the appellant's prima facie position.
Conclusion: The appellant established a strong prima facie case for interim relief, and unconditional waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery was granted.