Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery on the ground that the impugned services were exempt or otherwise not liable to Service Tax.
Analysis: The services relating to construction of sub-stations, re-conductering works and sub-contract work for the electricity distribution utility were held to fall within the scope of the exemption covering taxable services rendered in relation to transmission and distribution. The claim regarding works undertaken for CPWD was also found prima facie admissible in view of the Board circular relied upon. On this footing, the amounts already deposited were found sufficient to cover the requirement for hearing the appeal.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit was waived and stay against recovery was granted during the pendency of the appeal.