Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether coercive recovery of interest demand could be restrained during pendency of the assessee's appeal and stay petition, subject to payment of the admitted balance amount.
Analysis: The assessee had already filed appeals and stay petitions against the interest demand for earlier years and had made substantial deposits towards the demand. The demand arose towards interest on delayed payment of admitted service tax, and the Court noted the pendency of the stay petition before the appellate authority. In these circumstances, the Court granted interim protection from coercive action, while balancing the revenue's interest by directing payment of the admitted balance amount in two instalments. The Court expressly left open the maintainability and merits of the pending appeals.
Conclusion: Coercive action was restrained till disposal of the stay petition or appeal, whichever was earlier, subject to payment of the directed amount.