Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rights acquired under a lease arrangement amounted to a transfer of immovable property so as to attract deemed ownership under Section 27(iiib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the requisite factual findings under Section 269UA(f) were recorded.
Analysis: Section 27(iiib) deems a person to be the owner only where rights in a building are acquired by virtue of a transaction falling within Section 269UA(f). In the case of a lease of immovable property, the transfer condition is satisfied only if the lease is for a term of not less than twelve years, including extended terms where the aggregate period is twelve years or more. The material on record did not show any definite finding by the Tribunal or the High Court on the essential prerequisites under Section 269UA(f)(i) and its explanation. The matter therefore required reconsideration on facts.
Conclusion: The legal test for deemed ownership depends on satisfaction of the twelve-year lease requirement under Section 269UA(f), and in the absence of factual findings on that requirement, the matter had to be remitted to the Tribunal.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was sent back for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Deemed ownership under Section 27(iiib) arises only when the underlying lease transaction satisfies the statutory transfer conditions under Section 269UA(f), including the twelve-year requirement computed with extended terms where applicable.