Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, whether section 80P(4) applied to deny the deduction, and whether the alternative plea of mutuality could exempt the income.
Analysis: The assessee was found to be engaged predominantly in banking activity and in advancing only a very small portion of its loans for agricultural purposes. On the basis of its bye-laws, deposit-taking activities, lending pattern, and the statutory definition of a primary co-operative bank under section 5(ccv) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, the Tribunal held that the assessee satisfied the conditions of a primary co-operative bank. Once so classified, it fell within the exclusion contained in section 80P(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and could not claim the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The alternative plea of mutuality was rejected because the assessee's activities were in the nature of banking business and the principle of mutuality did not apply in the manner suggested.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to deduction under section 80P and the disallowance was upheld.