Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the circumstances of the case, waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty and stay of recovery was warranted.
Analysis: The applicant was a 100% EOU and the record showed that the finished goods were cleared on payment of duty. The Tribunal noted, prima facie, that the duty paid on clearance of the finished goods exceeded the amount demanded and that, if duty had been paid on the inputs, credit would have been available on the final product clearances. On that prima facie assessment, the balance of convenience was in favour of granting interim protection.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted.