Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudicating and appellate authorities exceeded the scope of the show cause notice by granting credit-related relief based on the assessee's defence, and whether the revenue's appeal against the resulting order had merit.
Analysis: The respondents had raised, in their reply to the show cause notice, the specific defence that if they were treated as separate units and duty was confirmed on one unit's clearances, the duty paid would be available as Cenvat credit to the other unit. The adjudicating authority accepted that contention, and the appellate authority affirmed it. Since the relief formed part of the defence taken in answer to the notice, the authorities did not travel beyond the notice while dealing with the matter.
Conclusion: The credit-related finding was within the scope of the proceedings and no infirmity was found in the impugned orders; the revenue's challenge failed.