Service tax on royalty and licence fee stayed where taxability was debatable and financial hardship supported partial pre-deposit waiver

Royalty and licence fee receipts were treated as a debatable issue because their taxability under service tax depended on close scrutiny of the agreements, and the departmental circular alone was insufficient to conclude the nature of the receipts. Financial hardship was also relevant to the pre-deposit question. On that basis, partial waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the balance demand, interest and penalties was stayed subject to compliance with the directed deposit.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the service tax demand, interest and penalties arising from the alleged taxability of royalty and licence fee.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the amounts received as royalty and licence fee were taxable service receipts or merely rentals/consideration outside the service tax net. The issue was considered debatable because the agreements required detailed scrutiny and the nature of the receipts could not be concluded solely from the departmental circular. The appellant also established financial hardship, which was relevant for considering waiver of the pre-deposit requirement.

Conclusion: Partial waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the balance demand, interest and penalties was stayed on compliance with the directed deposit.

---