Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether recovery proceedings could continue when the assessee's waiver-cum-stay petition was pending before the appellate tribunal.
Analysis: The dispute arose from an excise duty demand and the assessee's challenge thereto was pending before the tribunal along with a petition seeking waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. In the meantime, the department initiated recovery on the footing that no stay order was in force. The Court noted that though recovery is ordinarily permissible in the absence of a stay, the pending waiver-cum-stay petition had to be addressed by the appellate forum, particularly since regular sitting of the Bench had resumed and the grievance could be effectively redressed by an early disposal of that petition.
Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of by directing the tribunal to decide the waiver-cum-stay petition within four weeks, and recovery proceedings were restrained until then.
Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained interim protection against recovery, while the merits of the excise dispute were left to be considered by the appellate tribunal in the pending stay proceedings.