Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund claims relating to exports made before the issue of Notification No. 17/2009-S.T. were governed by Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. or by Notification No. 17/2009-S.T., and whether the claims filed within one year from the date of export were admissible.
Analysis: The refund claims had been rejected by applying the six-month period under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T., while the later notification provided for filing the claim within one year from the date of export. The relevant trade notice, based on the Board's view, stated that the scheme under Notification No. 17/2009-S.T. would apply even to exports made prior to its issuance, provided the refund claim was filed within the stipulated one-year period and no earlier claim had been filed under the previous notification. On that basis, the later notification was treated as applicable to the admissible part of the claims.
Conclusion: The refund claims were held admissible to the extent filed within one year from the date of export, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration of those claims accordingly.