Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the refund claim under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was barred by limitation when the amended notification extended the filing period to one year.
Analysis: The amended notification extended the time-limit for filing the refund claim to one year from the date of export. The claim was filed within that extended period. The amended procedural requirement was held applicable to pending claims, and the jurisdictional precedent and departmental circular supported the view that a claim filed within the revised period could not be rejected as time-barred, subject to fulfilment of the remaining conditions of the notification.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not hit by time bar and the assessee was entitled to consideration under the amended notification, subject to satisfaction of the other prescribed conditions.