Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit of tax deducted at source could be denied to the assessee merely because the deduction did not fully appear in the department's ITD system, and whether a recovery notice raised without granting such credit was sustainable.
Analysis: The liability to deduct tax at source lies on the deductor under the Act, and once tax is deducted and a certificate is issued, the deductee is entitled to credit of the amount so deducted. Section 205 bars recovery of tax from the assessee to the extent tax has been deducted at source from the income. If the deductor fails to deposit the deducted amount, the department's remedy is against the deductor, who may be treated as an assessee in default under the statutory scheme, and not against the deductee. A mismatch or non-reflection in the department's system does not by itself defeat the assessee's statutory right to TDS credit when deduction is otherwise established by the material produced.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to credit for the tax deducted at source evidenced by the Form 16A certificates, and the recovery notice issued without granting such credit could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where tax is admittedly deducted at source and the deductee produces the statutory certificate, credit cannot be denied merely because the amount is not reflected in the department's system; the proper remedy for non-deposit lies against the deductor, not the assessee.