Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2007 (7) TMI 7 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court rules TDS cannot be recovered from employee once deducted at source The court held that the revenue cannot recover the TDS amount from the employee once it is deducted at the source, even if the employer fails to deposit ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court rules TDS cannot be recovered from employee once deducted at source

                          The court held that the revenue cannot recover the TDS amount from the employee once it is deducted at the source, even if the employer fails to deposit it with the Government or issue a TDS certificate. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the revenue to refund the recovered amount with interest and to earmark the TDS liability as "not recoverable" from the petitioner. The court emphasized that the Act provides for the recovery of TDS from the employer who deducted it, not from the employee.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Recovery of TDS amount with interest from the employee when the employer fails to deposit the deducted TDS into the Government treasury.
                          2. Denial of credit for TDS amount due to non-issuance of TDS certificate by the employer.
                          3. Legal implications and remedies under sections 192, 199, 200, 201, 203, 205, 221, and 276B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Recovery of TDS Amount with Interest from the Employee:
                          The primary issue addressed is whether the revenue can recover the TDS amount with interest from the employee when the employer has deducted TDS from the salary but failed to deposit it into the Government treasury. The court held that under section 205 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, once the tax is deducted at source, it cannot be levied again on the employee. Section 205 clearly states that the assessee shall not be called upon to pay the tax himself to the extent to which tax has been deducted from that income. The court emphasized that the bar under section 205 comes into operation as soon as it is established that the tax has been deducted at source, irrespective of whether the tax deducted is paid to the Central Government or not.

                          2. Denial of Credit for TDS Amount Due to Non-issuance of TDS Certificate:
                          The petitioner claimed credit for the TDS amount deducted by the employer but was denied this credit due to the non-issuance of the TDS certificate (Form No.16) by the employer. The court acknowledged that under section 199, credit for TDS can be given on production of the TDS certificate issued under section 203. However, the court noted that the purpose of section 205 is to prevent double taxation. Even if the TDS certificate is not issued, the revenue cannot recover the TDS amount again from the employee once it is established that the tax was deducted at source. The court concluded that the non-availability of the TDS certificate does not justify the recovery of the TDS amount from the petitioner.

                          3. Legal Implications and Remedies under Various Sections of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
                          The court examined the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act:
                          - Section 192: Mandates the deduction of tax at source from salaries.
                          - Section 200: Requires the TDS amount to be paid to the credit of the Central Government within the prescribed time.
                          - Section 201: Deems the person who fails to deduct or pay TDS as an assessee in default, liable to pay interest and penalty, and creates a charge on all assets of such person.
                          - Section 203: Requires the issuance of a TDS certificate specifying the amount of tax deducted.
                          - Section 205: Bars the revenue from recovering the TDS amount again from the employee once it is deducted at source.
                          - Section 221: Provides for the levy of penalty for failure to pay TDS.
                          - Section 276B: Prescribes rigorous imprisonment and fine for failure to pay TDS to the credit of the Central Government.

                          The court concluded that the Act provides a complete machinery for the recovery of TDS from the person who has deducted it. The revenue must recover the TDS amount with interest and penalty from the employer who deducted the tax, not from the employee. The court directed the revenue to refund the amount of Rs.17,89,587/- recovered from the petitioner with interest at 6% from the date of recovery till the date of payment and to earmark the TDS liability as "not recoverable" from the petitioner.

                          Conclusion:
                          The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing that the revenue cannot recover the TDS amount from the employee once it is deducted at source, even if the employer fails to deposit it with the Government or issue a TDS certificate. The petition was allowed, and the revenue was directed to refund the recovered amount with interest.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found